Thin Film vs Tradition Solar Panels

Thin film, or dye-sensitized solar promises better versatility and lower prices than traditional silicon panels. But that does not makes the familiar shiny blue panels obsolete. 

A quick look at each type

Thin film solar is a flexible, lightweight material that converts sunlight into usable electricity. At this point, it is primarily used on larger commercial buildings (but also sometimes on calculators and even clothing). Traditional solar panels are rigid and comparatively thick silicon-based modules that are generally mounted on frames above residential or commercial roofs.  Although thin film solar sometimes uses amorphous silicon, it can also use a combination of different semi-conductor materials, including cadmium telluride (CdTe) and copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS).

Pros

The advantages of thin, flexible, lightweight solar are considerable. It can be incorporated into curved solar shingles, rolled out across roofs and building facades, and used in situations that would be unsuitable for mounting panels. Roofs that would need to be reinforced to support the weight of heavy panels can be used as-is, reducing installation costs.

This technology also requires fewer raw materials and fewer chemicals to produce. Although the production process currently remains pricy, thin film solar may eventually be able to compete with fossil fuels in terms of cost per watt.

An additional plus: although less effective than crystalline silicon panels in direct sunlight, it can be more effective in hazy or overcast conditions and at dawn and dusk because the different semi-conductor materials are sensitive to a wider range of the solar spectrum.

Cons

Thin film solar is still much less common than traditional silicon panels for a number of reasons. Cons include lower overall efficiency (therefore requiring considerably more space for the same output), high production costs, and the relative scarcity of tellurium, indium, and gallium. Types that contain highly toxic cadmium will have to be disposed of safely at the end of their lifetime.

Because of the large spaces required, the technology is generally not suitable for residential solar power. And because the technology is relatively new, durability, despite many lab tests, remains somewhat unproven. Degradation is also a major factor. The film loses about 10% efficiency after 10 years. Crystalline silicon panels are guaranteed not to lose more than 10% power over 20-25 years.

Both forms of solar are good sources of renewable energy, but your individual situation may make one more suitable to your commercial or residential solar power needs. Traditional crystalline solar panels or roof tiles continue to be more suited to residential solar power installations, where businesses may want to explore their expanded options.

Related Posts:
  1. How To Choose Best Thin-Film Solar Panels for Your Projects

    The process of choosing the best solar panel supplier includes many key points. I have tried to sum up most...

  2. Oerlikon Solar Further Reduces The Costs For Producing Thin Film Silicon Photovoltaic Panels–Significant Decrease in Cost of Process Gases Per Panel

    Major reduction in cost of process gases / panel, supported by the leading global gas suppliers Oerlikon Solar has announced...

  3. GE Thin Film Solar Panel 78 W, 80 W, 83 W

    GE’s CdTe thin film solar module combines industry leading solar technology with GE’s continued commitment to quality and customer value....

  4. Oerlikon Solar Receives Thin Film Coating Equipment Order from China

    Dong Xu Ltd. places order for multiple KAI thin film coating equipment Oerlikon Solar has recently announced an order from...

Leave a Reply